Also occupied a half months after the theatrical release “Avatar” all the 3D screens. Unfortunately for “Alice in Wonderland”

Somewhat different situation arises with Cinema. His house was set right from the beginning to 3D, says Arne Schmidt, spokesman for the Cinema chain. Therefore, both films could run on the 63 3D screens, which operates nationwide Cinema,
“Avatar” a clear advantage.

250 million U.S. dollars is said to have put Disney in the tale of the girl who falls into a rabbit hole and into a magical world. That is at least half of what should “have cost avatar. As it was already surprised that Disney did not, given the limited presentation of his new work in the Cinema Halls is abusive. Let it be that “Alice” is left in the third dimension to expectations? Apart from pure stunt characters like the Cheshire Cat, or the monster Jabbawocky to see mixed beings. Johnny Depp has been missed crazy eyes, white hair, Anne Hathaway and Helena Boham Carter, a water head. The Heart bube has the head of actor Crispin Glover, the rest is calculated. But because “Avatar has cost” around twice, it looks in “Alice” are also only half as elegant, if the jerky Heart bube through the picture.


Burton’s world is so shrill and loud and colorful, as the fans love them, but that is not always met by the story. And the effects are not exactly perfect. Cameron Pandora jungle makes surprise. Burton’s Wonderland has been seen anywhere before. Therefore, “Alice” probably the most pragmatic failure of the spectators, where there is ultimately no matter how much it cost and how long the film took its origin. The ticket price is ultimately the same.

“Has avatar” So the bar hung too high? Should the upcoming 3D movies for the mad genius of the man charged, who spent ten years of life in this fantastic journey to another planet, the new cameras and computer programs devised to ensure that the film might look the same as in his head?
Good vs. Pirates

The answer is pragmatic: “3D is not the measure of all things,” incites Cinema spokesman from Schmidt. He estimates the market share of spatial vision in the medium term to 20 percent. “When we do not need a third dimension.” This looks very similar Cinestar of jib.

But one thing is certain: 3D is here to stay. According to “Avatar” – if it is eventually sold for times – and “Alice in Wonderland” are the 3D family film “Dragon taming easy,” the three-dimensional Action “Clash of the Titans” and of course in November, the first part of the last Harry Potter “film. The same was filmed in 3D. Because – and this one should not forget the hype surrounding 3D: The third dimension is suitable fine in the fight against movie pirates. One can not finally filming. Not yet.